Gemini Generated Image

Addressing Regulatory Accounting with Digital Assets: A New Era for Bitcoin and Crypto

Roy M. Avila
Roy M. Avila
Published in
3 min readMay 6, 2024

--

The biggest headline here is fair value accounting for digital assets. Let’s examine the old model and its challenges to understand why this is so significant.

‘The Big Shift to Fair Value Accounting for Bitcoin and Other Digital Assets’

Under previous accounting rules, Bitcoin and other digital assets didn’t neatly fit into any existing category. They weren’t cash, cash equivalents, inventory (which requires tangibility), or financial instruments. They most resembled intangible assets like intellectual property, but unlike IP, they are actively traded.

The old model required companies to record these assets at their cost, which hopefully reflected fair value on the acquisition date. However, subsequent fluctuations in value weren’t reflected unless the asset was sold. This meant companies could hold assets worth much more or less than what was reflected in their books.

For example, imagine a company bought Bitcoin at $44,000 in January 2024, but by March, the price dropped to $38,000. Under the old model, the company would still report the Bitcoin at $44,000, even though its fair value had decreased. This created a disconnect between the financial statements and the economic reality of the asset.

Fair Value: A Win for Transparency

The new Accounting Standards Update (ASU) issued in December 2023 changes this by requiring companies to report digital assets at fair value. This is a major win for transparency and provides a more accurate picture of a company’s financial health.

Previously, companies often had to maintain two sets of books: one for internal purposes reflecting fair value and another for accounting purposes reflecting historical cost. This created a significant burden.

However, fair value accounting also comes with additional disclosure requirements. Investors need to understand a company’s digital asset holdings and how they are valued. Companies will need to disclose details like:

  • Significant holdings by type (e.g., Bitcoin, Ether)
  • Reconciliation of cost basis and subsequent activity
  • Methodology for determining fair value, including the principal market used

Challenges and Considerations

While fair value is a positive step, there are challenges:

  • Scope: Not all digital assets are explicitly covered by the new standard. Determining which assets fall under its scope can be complex.
  • Disclosure Burden: Companies, particularly those holding various digital assets, will need robust processes to gather and report the required disclosures.
  • Fair Value Nuances: Digital assets trade 24/7 across multiple exchanges. Selecting a principal market and determining fair value at a specific point in time requires careful consideration.
  • Tax Implications: Accounting and tax treatment often diverge. Companies must be aware of book-to-tax differences arising from unrealized gains and losses, principal market determination, and early adoption considerations.

The Impact of SAB 121

Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121, issued by the SEC in March 2022, addresses a separate but related issue: accounting for obligations related to safeguarding crypto assets for platform users.

SAB 121 requires companies to safeguard crypto assets so that others can record a liability at fair value and a corresponding asset reflecting any potential losses. This can significantly impact a company’s regulatory capital, potentially restricting its ability to enter the crypto custody space.

While SAB 121 itself doesn’t define “safeguarding,” the SEC has broadly interpreted it. The ASPA digital assets working group has issued Q&As to provide guidance on applying SAB 121.

Conclusion

The adoption of fair value accounting for digital assets is a significant development, enhancing transparency and reflecting the true value of these assets on company balance sheets. However, companies must be aware of the challenges associated with fair value determination, disclosures, and potential tax implications. Additionally, SAB 121 creates considerations for businesses involved in safeguarding crypto-assets.

Credits to: Amy Park Partner, US Audit & Assurance Blockchain & Digital, Deloitte

Amy Park Partner, US Audit & Assuance Blockchain & Digital, Deloitte
Amy Park Partner, US Audit & Assurance Blockchain & Digital, Deloitte

Full Episode @ https://youtu.be/wTJCgFUVy3o?t=20007

Disclaimer: By engaging with this content, you acknowledge that the information provided is solely for educational purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other professional advice. Additionally, no endorsement of any specific cryptocurrency asset is implied.

#cryptoaccounting #bitcoinaccounting #digitalassets #fairvalue #FASB #financialreporting #cryptoregulation #SAB121 #blockchain #investorconfidence

--

--

Roy M. Avila
Roy M. Avila

A technology enthusiast and an advocate long time promoter towards a healthy wellness lifestyle.